Ok. So he finally got back with me but not with much more information. If you follow the course of the conversation he remains consistent. My original build date according to him was "Tentatively" March, 27th. When I asked for an update on March 17th (10 days ago), he lists April 10th as the nearest date they would have approval to start building it. I asked today for a bit of clarification on this, and he is saying they have been pushed back 10 days, this would be April the 6th. Considering, he is relatively in the same time frame as April 10th and the date is actually being shortened I am taking that as a good thing. He could have easily said it's going to be more like 2 weeks and bought some more time but he genuinely seems to believe that it is going to happen sooner rather than later. They must have gotten some indication from the EPA that they are close to wrapping things up or I don't believe he would be as upbeat as he is.
I think it needs to be said that I am simply trying to help people out with this information. I gain nothing from this. I find it offensive that certain members here have flamed me for passing on what information that has been provided. I don't even own one of these yet; although, I still want one.
Has anyone else that is on the waiting list been given any information? I figured some of these might have been built and they would have gotten some information by now.....
Thanks again to those who have participated in a friendly manner. BoostN knows how long I debated on putting in an order and it has taken considerable amount of patience to wait this long.
****,
**** (FCA) <****@fcagroup.com>
Jan 24
to me
Thanks for your note back Mr. ****, and my sincere apology for not responding. I just missed it, and have no good excuse for that. We still have every intention of building 2017 Model Eco-diesels, and are expecting an update later today. This will be the results from extensive testing done last week. Good or bad, I will make sure I update you later today when we receive the latest information. Once again, my apologies for lack of responsiveness.
****
From: **** [mailto:
****@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 11:57 PM
To: **** (FCA)
Subject: Re: Your RAM 1500 EcoDiesel Truck
Why have you never replied to any of my questions? Why on earth would you send me an email and then refuse to follow up with anything.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:15 PM, **** <
****@gmail.com> wrote:
****,
Thanks again for the email detailing why there is a hold up on my 2017 ecodiesel. I regret that I am going to be canceling my order since no one seems to know, anything. I was considering holding off on buying new and just getting a temp; however, it seems at this point the ED, might not even make a 2017 appearance. It looks as though Toyota will have a v6 turbo diesel in a 2018 model. I am probably going to wait on that our maybe see where the best incentives are.
Thanks,
****
A one time Chrysler customer.
On Dec 22, 2016 11:55 AM, "**** (FCA)" <
****@fcagroup.com> wrote:
Dear RAM truck Customer,
My name is **** ****, and I work in the Order-to-Delivery group at FCA US (FCA). Thank you for purchasing the RAM 1500 pickup equipped with the 3.0L Eco-Diesel engine.
You likely know that prior to shipping any vehicle, for every new model year FCA must obtain EPA’s certification that our vehicles comply with federal emissions standards. This year, across all automakers, EPA is being extra careful about certifying diesel vehicles. So, FCA continues to wait for this certification for the 2017 RAM 1500 Eco-Diesel truck.
I just wanted to reach out and let you know that once the certification is approved, we will expedite the building and shipping of your vehicle.
We are closely monitoring the situation. We really do appreciate your patience, and please let me know if you have any questions.