• Welcome to EcoDieselRam.com We see you haven't REGISTERED yet.

    Your truck knowledge is missing!
    • Registration is FREE , all we need is your birthday and email. (We don't share ANY data with ANYONE)
    • We have tons of knowledge here for your EcoDiesel truck!
    • Post your own topics and reply to existing threads to help others out!
    • We believe in quality OVER quantity, and a family friendly place for your #EcoDiesel home!
    CLICK HERE TO REGISTER! Problems registering? Click here to contact us!

    Already registered, but need a PASSWORD RESET? CLICK HERE TO RESET YOUR PASSWORD!

Ecodiesel Failures/EPA 3.0 FCA Emails Granted Public Access

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
As I mentioned over the phone, the defect reports have been submitted for 14MY, 15MY,


16MY.

We have a bearing problem due to premature bearing wear due to inadequate oil film thickness

at low rpm I high engine torque conditions.


The near term solution is to change the engine oil from 5W-30 to 5W-40. The higher viscosity

leads to a thicker oil film at the bearing.


upload_2018-2-7_18-55-57.png

LMBO 1500.diesel.opps/com I have 100s pages of the 3.0 History dating back to Aug of 2013.
 

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
Comments taken form 595 page memo on EPA / FCA History , If its Not Public Now I would expect it to become Public soon.. I've had it for some time, I do Thank the person that sent it to Me (Whoever that might be)

I stand By my last 3 years of Statements that the 3.0 had QC issue's. My 3.0 has been Flawless after I replaced 2 undersides Main Bearings Back in May 2015. The 3.0 is Hero Zero status up to the un-jailing 17s, the 2017 is having a real struggle starting/operating -0 temps.

In this memo is actions FCA has taken towards warranty issues surrounding the 3.0. and its dealings with EPA.
 

John

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2015
1,186
386
I would love to see the source directly as I'm having a difficult time connecting EPA vs. FCA concerning warranty issues. No doubt the 3.0 has issues with spun bearings. I just don't see the connection with the EPA.
 

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
I'll get the event in the memo, The EPA was correcting FCA stand on the Warranty concerning warranty denied.
 

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
Ahh.... This is communications between FCA and EPA and internal communications of both Organizations. If you want to Know the status of the DOJ case look it up Both Civil/and Criminal.
 

Osteoblast

New Member
Apr 8, 2017
11
3
Truck Year
2015
Todd is a diesel rock star! [emoji450][emoji450][emoji450]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
I use play but not any more..at the end of the Day/Night you're a Musician carrying Box's
 

Osteoblast

New Member
Apr 8, 2017
11
3
Truck Year
2015
I use play but not any more..at the end of the Day/Night you're a Musician carrying Box's

What did you play? I’ve been at the electric guitar since the first Ted Nugent album came out....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

John

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2015
1,186
386
Good job TC. You brought some good to know information to this forum and I for one appreciate it. I'll say your presentation was a bit confusing but in any case it's all there if you search through the over 1000 emails.
 

John

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2015
1,186
386
might as well add this to TC's findings.

First and foremost to revise the calibration to reduce crankshaft bearing loads during low
rpm/high load conditions. These failures increased 61% May-July 2016 as compared to JanuaryMarch, 2016. The failures increased another 30% August-October, 2016 averaging 215/month.
We have been holding to clear the 2017 MY cert through your teams. We cannot wait any
longer with this frequency of failure.
 

John

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2015
1,186
386
Not sure if my previous post was clear. This is another FCA email to go along with what TC originally posted.

Anyone else surprised to see the failure rate at an average of 215/month? This is no longer speculation. it's according to the FCA email recently released.
 

BoostN

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Jul 27, 2013
4,314
1,136
Truck Year
Not Listed
Not sure if my previous post was clear. This is another FCA email to go along with what TC originally posted.

Anyone else surprised to see the failure rate at an average of 215/month? This is no longer speculation. it's according to the FCA email recently released.

Yep, it's an issue for sure. Now, how do they fix it? ...and will they fix it?
 

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
OAs is the only solution to indicate how well the rotating mass is performing.. its not 100% conclusive , trend will show wear metals.
FCA current and passed behavior is any indication they will need to Be forced to make correction in many cases.
 

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
This info is dated 3-27-2013.

upload_2018-2-23_6-38-47.png

upload_2018-2-23_6-39-47.png

upload_2018-2-23_6-40-18.png

Seem to be big problems with the DEF matching Service intervals, My question is WHY, the DEF is used and replaced on demand, Seems silly to Me the EPA was concerned
 
Last edited:

TC Diesel

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2016
2,489
711
Truck Year
2015
upload_2018-2-23_7-28-19.png

The EPA require this ..... it was repealed do to complexity and it was NOT require until 2016.
 

justlucky

Member
May 15, 2016
77
18
Truck Year
2016
I just recieved this from the laywer looks like no buy backs for any one..

Good afternoon,

Many of you have contacted us about a Bloomberg report that the Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency have offered to settle a case against Fiat Chrysler for the EcoDiesel vehicles. That settlement, if reached, would be between Fiat Chrysler and the U.S. Government. Although that lawsuit alleges the same claims brought by Hagens Berman on behalf of consumers, it is a separate lawsuit. The consumer suit against Fiat Chrysler will continue even if the U.S. Government and Fiat Chrysler reach a settlement.

Currently, Fiat Chrysler is seeking EPA approval for a software modification that it says will bring the vehicles into compliance. Once that happens, and we see what effect the modification has on the vehicles, we can better estimate what we believe is owed to consumers.

Fiat Chrysler and Bosch have also asked the Court to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ claims. We have opposed the motions, and a hearing took place on December 19, 2017 in front of Judge Chen. We should have a decision shortly.

Many thanks,
Jessica

Jessica Thompson
Attorney
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
hbsslaw.com
portal.hbsslaw.com
 
Top